Skip to content
PoliTrackerPrototype - alpha version 0.1
← Policies

Active

Bill · 119th Congress · HR 6506

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act

Refreshed 3 h ago

Introduced 2025-12-09Topic: taxes · governance ethics

Summary

Summary by the Congressional Research Service

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act This bill suspends the period of time allowed for claiming a federal tax refund (limitations period) during collection due process (CDP) proceedings, prohibits the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from applying tax overpayments to a tax liability that is disputed in such proceedings, and expands the Tax Court’s jurisdiction. As background, IRS collection actions and the underlying tax liability (in some circumstances) may be disputed in a CDP hearing. Collection actions are suspended during CDP proceedings, but the IRS may apply tax overpayments from other tax years to the disputed tax liability. The Tax Court may review an appeal of a CDP hearing determination. However, the Supreme Court held in Commissioner v. Zuch that the Tax Court loses jurisdiction over a CDP appeal if the CDP hearing determination is revoked because tax overpayments are applied to and fully satisfy the tax liability. In such circumstances, the taxpayer may claim a refund and seek redress in federal district court. Currently, the limitations period to file a refund claim is not suspended during CDP proceedings. The bill suspends the limitations period for claiming a tax refund during CDP proceedings (with exceptions), prohibits the IRS from applying tax overpayments to a properly disputed tax liability during CDP proceedings (unless waived or an exception applies), expands the Tax Court's jurisdiction in CDP cases to include jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability amount (if properly disputed), and provides that the Tax Court retains its jurisdiction if the IRS abandons collection actions.

Full text and official record on Congress.gov

Sponsors

Action history

DateChamberActionStatus effect
2026-05-20SenateReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.refer
2026-05-19HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2026-05-19HouseOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)
2026-05-19Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)floor pass
2026-05-19HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6506.
2026-05-19HouseConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3564-3567)
2026-05-19HouseMr. Smith (MO) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
2026-01-07HousePlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 373.
2026-01-07HouseReported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.report
2026-01-07Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.report
2025-12-10HouseOrdered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.refer
2025-12-10HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Heldrefer
2025-12-09HouseReferred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.refer
2025-12-09Introduced in Houseintroduce
2025-12-09Introduced in Houseintroduce
Source: GovInfo Bill Status (Library of Congress), fetched 2026-09-20. Provisions and opinion polling arrive in a later release.